Sent by Peter Hyde-Smith on 8 March 2008 00:12
Phoebe Taylor wrote
> If you guys wouldn't mind, could I get a site check on this?
>
> http://www.cgraytaylor.net
>
> It seems to check out okay for me in Firefox, IE 7, and Opera. I had
> to lower the font size in the gallery photo descriptions for Opera to
> lay out the text correctly which makes it a touch small for my tastes,
> but is better than having orphan words. It's my first CSS site, so
> some critiques would be much appreciated.
>
Phoebe:
Welcome to CSS!
I am using Win XP Home SP2. Very pleasing intial impression. FF2.0 looks
good except for text growing out the bottom, per David Laakso. O9.26 looks
good. Avant 11.5 looks good. IE8 beta looks good. Your fixed pixel fonts
don't scale in IE/Avant. Personally, I would lose the "Best viewed in....or
greater resolution" That should be a user decision. An orphan </a> tag is
causing a few minor errors, per the W3C validator. Keep up the good work.
Best Regards,
Peter Hyde-Smith
www.fatpawdesign.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
