[ADMIN - THIS THREAD HAS SLID WAY OFF TOPIC] Re: "Weak" layout

Sent by Alex Robinson on 7 June 2007 15:03

OK folks, enough is enough.

Opinions about how browsers should handle zooming and text-resizing 
are not what this list exists for.

Nor does the list exist for opinions about whether to use scalable or 
fixed sizes.

Questions and help about how to achieve scalable or fixed solutions 
on the other hand are very much the point of this list.

I think Trevor should have enough brainfood to be getting on with, 
but if anyone does have any practical suggestions as to how to 
improve his layout, then that would be fabulous.


Alex "I am weak" Robinson
css-d moderator
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Message thread:

• Divs moving up the page - ron zisman, 6th June 2007 20:27
  • "Weak" layout - trevor bayliss, 6th June 2007 22:41
    • "Weak" layout - Francesco Rizzi, 6th June 2007 23:14
    • "Weak" layout - David Laakso, 7th June 2007 05:59
      • "Weak" layout - Paul Novitski, 7th June 2007 06:25
        • "Weak" layout - Sarah Atkinson, 7th June 2007 14:38
          • "Weak" layout - Nic Pulford, 7th June 2007 14:57
          • "Weak" layout - Don Miller, 7th June 2007 14:59
            • "Weak" layout - Barney Carroll, 7th June 2007 15:13
              • [ADMIN - THIS THREAD HAS SLID WAY OFF TOPIC] Re: "Weak" layout - Alex Robinson, 7th June 2007 15:24
        • "Weak" layout - ron zisman, 7th June 2007 15:18
          • "Weak" layout - trevor bayliss, 7th June 2007 20:57
            • "Weak" layout - David Laakso, 7th June 2007 21:38