Sent by james shannon on 27 April 2007 10:10
It should validate fine; it's a perfectly legal construction.
One good reason for using it is to add specificity. div.home might be
defined elsewhere, and div#holder.home is far more specific and thus
will override it (thought I'd use other methods).
Also useful when you have lots of pages and need to keep things
separate. There's probably a <div id="holder" class="products">
elsewhere on the site.
I use something similar in that I have a container div that can have
two different display settings: advanced and basic. So I define a
bunch of stuff like:
div#question.basic .advanced_options {display:none;}
div#question.advanced .subquestion {color: red;}
etc.
james
On Apr 27, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Austin Harris wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> I am doing some work on a site that I haven't built and have found
> something slightly strange...
>
> basis of html;
>
> <div id="holder" class="home">
>
> blah blah
>
> </div>
>
> css;
>
> div#holder.home {
> styles...
> }
>
> Strangely this does work across all the browsers I have (briefly)
> tested on yet does cause validation errors.
>
> I can't see any issues as to why taking out the #holder from the
> css will make any difference but was really more wondering why
> someone would have done this in the first place...
>
> Austin
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
