> AFAICT, you'll probably have to create a new page for your print version
> (with either very basic, print-oriented HTML, or plain text).
> Sucks, huh?
I agree. If the content were dynamically generated, it would be easier
(that is, you could make an alternate generation page that has the
simple html to which mark refers), but it looks like most of the site is
static. Does it not print well as is in NS4.79?
Also, at the risk of being accused of browser-bashing, I was surprised
> > My direct supervisor, head of online services for
> > our company, uses NN4.79,