thanks so much for your replies
*cristina*, have u found your css fails? mine never fall down.
ill read more in details your email, later on- promise :)
*dwain, **cristina, *look at this example, plz enlighten my eyes if im doing
look at the source, it based on eric mayers listematic
using table for this example, i would have done that in no time. i would
have got vertical-align easly, td-box hieght and it was so easy to acvhive
that goal in few secs and less code/css
but here i broke my soul to achive this goal. i had to use 2 styles for the
same nav. i had to define DIV style, and A style. its so complecated for no
cheers for any sugestions.
On 9/22/05, dwain alford [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
> shlomi asaf wrote:
> > HI Guys
> > I'm facing now the dilemma between working with tables or div's
> > im trying to figure what is the "golden path"
> in short, tables should be used for tabular data and divs are used as
> containers for positioning. as you work with (x)html and css rather
> than tables you will find that this is less code heavy than tables. in
> the beginning there can be much frustration in positioning elements, but
> when you begin to understand what you can do with html/css pages, quite
> frankly, you will not want to go back to using tables for layout.
> i have been using html/css for layout for just over a year, and i don't
> think that i could do a table layout if my mother's life depended on it.
> there is more freedom in using html/css based layout over table layouts.
> sure, tables are quicker to layout, especially if you are a wysiwyger,
> but i've been hand coding for just over a year, and i don't even
> consider wysiwyg as an option any more.
> there was an advertisement long ago that espoused, "try it you'll like
> it!" html/css based layouts appear to be more standards compliant than
> table layouts (imo).
> dwain alford
> The Savior replied;
> "There is no such thing as sin;..."
> 'The Gospel of Mary of Magdala'
shlomi asaf wrote:
> I'm facing now the dilemma between working with tables or div's
> im trying to figure what is the "golden path"
IMHO it shouldn't be a tables Vs divs argument - because both have their
place when correctly marked up. It should be a "tables for formatting"
Vs CSS argument. Plus divs can be just as overused (I'm just as guilty
CSS will make your sites much easier to maintain in the future, if they
are marked up correctly you will still be able to use the site even if
your stylesheet fails. (Or more to the point your visitor decides they
want to turn it off, or apply their own styling).
The thing that is important is that you shouldn't force your website to
be viewed a certain way. Which a table formatted design will try to do
and will also be more difficult to use on different platforms.
I totally understand what you mean about table formatted design being
easier to create.
But just try a little test - try navigating around your site using
nothing but the keyboard, try it on other sites too - ones that are CSS
driven and ones that are table driven. See how you get on. Now turn
off the CSS and images - are those sites still usable/accessible? Are
your sites still usable/accessible? Which in your opinion came out
best? They might not look as pretty - but when it comes down to it -
people want to access and use the information.
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/