Sent by Stuart Homfray on 5 September 2005 15:03
Michael Landis wrote:
>> I didn't find any reference to the correct syntax, though.
>
> Thank goodness for Google on the W3! [2] Unfortunately, it appears
> that it defines what indicators should appear if text should overflow
> its container, versus dictating how the text itself overflows. It
> hasn't yet been included in the latest draft[3], so it may be too soon
> to tell.
>
Sorry Michael - *THAT* will teach me to read ALL my emails first, before
replying!!
cheers,
Stuart
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
