Previous Message
Next Message

EM vs % values for padding/margin and width

Sent by Bob Easton on 15 May 2005 11:11


Leo Smith wrote:
> When using EM values for font sizes, it seems optimal to then use EM 
> values for any margin-top, padding-top, margin-bottom, or padding-bottom 
> values for the content elements (p, ul, ol, etc). This way, when text is 
> resized, the vertical distance between content elements increases 
> proportionately.
> 
> But, what about right and left margins and padding. Is it also optimal 
> to use EM values for those as well, so that any horizontal spacing also 
> increases proportionately with resized text?
> 
> Similarly, would it be better to use EM values for the widths of fluid 
> column divs, rather than percentage values?

I tend to use EM units for all of the margin and padding attributes, 
including left and right. I do this for exactly the reason you state in 
the second paragraph.

For columns in a fluid layout, it just seems easier to visualize when 
working in percentages.

-- 
Bob Easton
Accessibility Matters: http://access-matters.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Previous Message
Next Message

Message thread: