Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9

Sent by Gary Ross on 5 April 2005 12:12

>
> Unless you have a real need for XHTML (and 99.99% of websites do not),
> then I suggest you stick to HTML 4.01. Its has fewer issues.

Can you give some examples of these issues?
Gary

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Message thread:

• Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 - Little Girl, 4th April 2005 23:10
  • Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 - David Dorward, 5th April 2005 00:24
    • Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 - Gary Ross, 5th April 2005 12:10
      • Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 - David Dorward, 5th April 2005 15:18
  • Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 - Little Girl, 5th April 2005 01:05
  • Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 {bump} - Little Girl, 5th April 2005 08:16
    • Internet explorer on OS X and possible OS 9 {bump} - Roger Roelofs, 5th April 2005 11:55