Sent by Tuttle Grey on 21 April 2002 14:02
>From: Jim Chaffin [EMAIL-REMOVED]>
>To: [EMAIL-REMOVED]
>Subject: [css-d] RE: link underline won't go away...
>Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:52:34 -0500
>
>From a post by Hugh Blair:
> >.link { ... width: 90%; text-decoration: none}
> >a:link.menu { ... width: 90%; text-decoration: none}
> >a:menu.link { ... width: 90%; text-decoration: none}
>
>Sounds like you got the straight skinny on using different link styles
>in different places. I do the same as you, it appears!
Well, the above is wrong. Some browsers may accept it and render it, but it
is incorrect. It's worth learning the correcty syntax for pseudo-elements
and classes so that your intended result will be achieved in all compliant
browsers. See my post of last night for details.
>But I wondered
>about the above definitions failing (at least in some instances) because of
>the missing ";" after the "none"
The semi-colon is optional after the final property/value. In examples
provided it would be valid and should not have caused a problem. However, I
consider it good practice to include it anyway. This way if you later add a
new property following that one, you won't suddenly have the problem of
unexpected results due to the missing semi-colon.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
