Previous Message
Next Message

Re: Font Scaling? 800x600 vs. 1280x1024 vs. 2560 x 1600

Sent by Ryan Cannon on 16 December 2004 18:06


I had been using ems for all of my font-sizes, but having a single 
baseline: html { font-size: #px } and having all of my fonts relative to 
that baseline. Perhaps it does make sense to allow the user to set the 
baseline, but to do so invites some trouble.
So should the vast majority of my vertical heights be in ems, and my 
widths in exes, max-widths in percentages and max-heights be unset?  
This seems to me the only way to make a truly liquid layout work in all 
browsers, but add some images and you get a nightmare.

Would a good solution be to use fixed-size elements: inches, centimeters 
and points? I'm not sure how I feel about that either, nor how well it 
is implemented in most browsers.

Ryan Cannon
Freelance Web Design
RyanCannon.com <http://ryancannon.com/?refer=email>
(989) 463-7060


______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Previous Message
Next Message

Message thread:

Possibly related: