Sent by Bob McClelland on 3 December 2004 12:12
Thanks to all who responded. The reason I'm labouring the point here is
because the very simple styling:
width : 450;
w\idth : 400;
type of thing works for me (IE 5.5, IE6, quirks and standards, Mozilla 1,
Firefox 1, Opera 7), so why should I use anything else? Michael (Wilson)
suggested adding an extra line (which is OK):
width: 400px;
\width: 450px;
w\idth: 400px;
but Zeldman and others suggest using the clumsy voice things. I ask myself
why, if the simple things do actually work properly?
I knocked up a very simple example of this at:
http://www.treyarnon.fsworld.co.uk/bmh.html
and tested it with my (few) browsers. Fine!
So can you understand my concerns? (I do like simple things, where possible
:-)
Thanks,
Bob McClelland,
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/