No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways?

Sent by Secret Agent Gel on 1 November 2004 16:04

>It is
> JavaScript though as Terrence suggested, so you do run the risk of
> "middots" not appearing on non-javascript enabled browsers.

when you talk about javascript like this i assume you mean
"document.write('·');" or am i missing some other method?

thanks,
corey
_
Corey H Maass
aka Secret Agent Gel
http://www.secretagentgel.com
ICQ: 103314728 | AIM: secretagentgel2
Contact: 646/228.5048
- - - - - - - - - - -
The Kids Are Bored
Live Electronic Music: Wherever you are
http://www.thekidsarebored.com

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Message thread:

• No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Aryan, 1st November 2004 01:59
  • No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Terrence Wood, 1st November 2004 02:41
    • No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Trovster, 1st November 2004 03:35
      • No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Secret Agent Gel, 1st November 2004 16:23
  • No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Larry Israel, 1st November 2004 03:10
  • No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Alex Robinson, 1st November 2004 04:12
  • No before and after pseudo-elements support = less conventional ways? - Paul Novitski, 2nd November 2004 11:33