Sent by David Dorward on 18 October 2004 09:09
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:33:37 +0200, Arno [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
> For IE I use "scrollbar-base-color: rgb(x,x,x); scrollbar-track-color:
> rgb(x,x,x)" etc. to give the scroll bar color. I know this doesn't work in any
> other browser than in IE, but does that automatically mean that the w3c
> validator doesn't recognise it?
The validator doesn't recognise it becuase it is comparing your code
to the standard. It is possible that there are some aspects of the
standard which IE supports but no other browser does (although I can't
think of any off the top of my head), but the scroll bar altering code
is an unofficial Microsoft extension and not part of the standard.
> When I started using xhtml to code I started also to use the following line in
> combination with the doctype specification:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> I had to add some ssi on some pages
> Thus I did, but now when I check the page offline, the .shtml files are shown
> as XML tree, because I can't seem to parse XML pages offline on my machine
> (even if I've installed some server software that should be able to cope with it).
> When I remove the <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> from the top of the
> .shtml documents, it shows again correctly.
It sounds like whatever server module you are using to parse the SSI
is noticing that it is XML and sending it as application/xml or
text/xml instead of text/html (or, more correctly,
application/xml+xhtml). Check the content-type header returned by the
server along with the manual for your SSI parser.
--
David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk><http://blog.dorward.me.uk>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
