On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:01:44 -0400, Scott Hamm [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
> Wait, do you mean like so:
> <ol>
> <li>
> </ol>
> </li>
> </ol>
What I meant, if you want to be picky, is
<ol>
<li>
<ol>
<li/>
</ol>
</li>
<ol>
since the ordered list must contain at least one list item, and
nothing but list items.
As Eric notes, however, the W3C HTML Validator would tell you this,
and the question is not really on topic for this list.
--
David "liorean" Andersson
<uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
