At 12:57 AM 9/27/2004 +0300, you wrote: >On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Mike wrote: > > > If it works - why is it considered bad code? > >If you think it works and you are happy with it, why do you ask us? For guidance and help and a better method to archive my goals. >It almost certain that your "H tags" are semantically not headings at all >and/or your "P tags" are not paragraphs. If you however wish to use such >constructs, don't be surprised if people suggest more solid approaches. I have yet to have "more solid approaches" suggested, but I am sureI will. This is what I am hoping for, not just critics and mockery. >CSS is difficult enough, especially considering browser bugs and >deficiencies, even without adding to the confusion by intentionally using >invalid markup for no good reason. I do have a "good reason", but apparently it is not clear to you. Does everyone else on the list feel the same way? >I have little idea of what you are >aiming at, but it really seems to me that you just want some background >images for your headings. Even if those imaged contained text only, it is >still better to make the background images than text, if their purpose is >just visual decoration. (As so often, a good criterion is: what would you >like a speech browser to read, or a search engine to extract, index and >find?) > > > I know, that's no excuse for using invalid code, but... > >... you posted just to write such excuses? If you have to ask, then I have not made my hopes and needs clear - to you at least. What else can say? -Mike ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
