Sent by Bruce on 4 August 2004 21:09
This is a rant. OF COURSE microcost doesn't care. To them, CSS is
misnamed, should be MCSS, and Micro is the rule and that should end it.
Make the others follow Microsoft and let the standards group get their
act together and define the standards the 'correct' way'
Dave Silvester wrote:
>
>Well, the way I look at it is: there's a standard that is agreed on by all members of the W3C,
including Microsoft. If browser vendors break the agreed standards, or are aware that their browser
doesn't work as the standards intend, yet do nothing to remedy that situation, then what choices do
they leave us with?
>
>It goes without saying that IE is the worst offender. CSS development time would be cut in half
across the board if it wasn't for IE wasting everyone's time with it's ridiculous bugs.
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
