Sent by Jeroen Visser [ vizi ] on 1 August 2004 17:05
Dave Silvester wrote:
> On Friday 30 Jul 2004 13:38, Jeroen Visser [ vizi ] wrote:
>
>>Personally I don't understand the 'I have to use hacks but still want my
>>CSS to validate'. Seems a contradictio in terminis to me.
>
> All the hacks I use validate. (Comment hacks, star html etc. all validate.)
I know there are hacks that pass the CSS validator. But that's not what
I'm talking about. My point is: hacks are aimed at *browser-specific*
rendering issues where validation is aimed at *browser-independent*
standards. Hacking your CSS *and* aiming to comply with the standards
appears to have some contradiction in it.
Please, don't get me wrong: I sometimes use hacks to. And I'm not trying
to start some heated debate pro or con hacking. It's just something that
struck me.
Jeroen
--
vizi fotografie & grafisch ontwerp
I http://www.vizi.nl/
E [EMAIL-REMOVED]
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
