Sent by Chris Heilmann on 23 June 2004 08:08
Spartanicus wrote:
>"Richard Grevers" [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>If an image is "purely decorative" then it contains no textual
>>information, probably has an empty alt text, and requires no "replacement
>>technique".
>>
>>
>
>I'm talking about the current fad to no longer use the <img ...> tag and
>replace it with spans or divs sized in css with the desired image
>specified as a background image. Am I wrong to refer to this as "Image
>Replacement"?
>
>
>
Yes you are. Googling for image replacement brings up this nice
introduction *http://www.stopdesign.com/articles/replace_text/*
What you mean is "keeping all visuals in the CSS", which might make
sense in a certain environment, but normally doesn't.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
