Sent by Spartanicus on 23 June 2004 08:08
"Richard Grevers" [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
>If an image is "purely decorative" then it contains no textual
>information, probably has an empty alt text, and requires no "replacement
>technique".
I'm talking about the current fad to no longer use the <img ...> tag and
replace it with spans or divs sized in css with the desired image
specified as a background image. Am I wrong to refer to this as "Image
Replacement"?
--
Spartanicus
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/