Previous Message
Next Message

Image Replacement Quirks

Sent by Spartanicus on 23 June 2004 08:08


"Richard Grevers" [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:

>If an image is "purely decorative" then it contains no textual  
>information, probably has an empty alt text, and requires no "replacement  
>technique".

I'm talking about the current fad to no longer use the <img ...> tag and
replace it with spans or divs sized in css with the desired image
specified as a background image. Am I wrong to refer to this as "Image
Replacement"?

-- 
Spartanicus
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Previous Message
Next Message

Message thread:

Possibly related: