Sent by Joel Kitching on 23 June 2004 00:12
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:34:37 -0400, Steve Clay [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
>
> Tuesday, June 22, 2004, 12:28:06 PM, Joel wrote:
> JK> I can't see how one would sacrifice their site's accessibility with CSS
> JK> Image Replacement hacks...
>
> There are IR methods that don't sacrifice accessibility, one great one in
> particular:
>
<http://www.ryznardesign.com/web_coding/image_replacement/2004/gilder_levin_ryznar_jacoubsen/glrj_1_static.html>
>
> * text visible if image fails to load
> * screen reader friendly
> * works without javascript
> * underlying text can usually be selected and copied
>
> overview: <http://www.ryznardesign.com/web_coding/image_replacement/>
>
> Steve
> --
> http://mrclay.org/ : http://frenchhorns.mrclay.org/
>
>
Nevertheless, there is a significant con to this method. It prevents
the usage of transparent replacement images, in particular png files,
which would be a complete and utter joy to have on a colourful
background.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
