Sent by Francesco on 22 June 2004 23:11
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:04:49 +0300, "Rimantas Liubertas"
[EMAIL-REMOVED]> said:
> What am I missing? There should be no "Foreground images that are
> strictly decorative."
> if we are talking "correctly". Frankly, I see no sense.
What are you saying? Foreground images cannot be decorative? All
decorative images must be background images?
----------------------------------------------
Francesco Sanfilippo, Blackcoil Productions
----------------------------------------------
My life, ideas, photos, and projects:
http://www.blackcoil.com
----------------------------------------------
If you send links through email and IM, you
should be using this amazing free service:
http://www.url123.com
----------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
