Sent by tedd on 31 January 2004 16:04
>On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:15:10 -0500, tedd [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi:
>>
>>When designing a site using css, what at is an acceptable zoom
>>range for a site?
>>
>>For example, is a site "okay" if nothing breaks between
>>magnifications of 75 to 120 percent? Or does a site have to hold up
>>throughout all magnifications, or what? Keep in mind that while IE6
>>for windows has five zoom levels, Safari has ten.
>
>Opera has 21 levels and Mozilla has a theoretical infinity, it looks
>like, so it's really up to you.
>
>--
>J. King
J. King et al:
I beg to differ -- it's not up to me. I would think that it's up to
the normal standards as expected by, and the abilities of, the css
community. I am asking what's the standard? Is there one? What's the
norm? Is this something for us as css developers to be concerned
about or not?
I can't help but think that our end-product must accommodate those
with visibility problems -- right? It's the law, isn't it? If so,
then by what degree? Is it 100% compliance with the total range of
every browser, or partial range within certain acceptable and
obtainable limits, or do we just not worry about it... the latter
being unacceptable.
So, does anyone know -- or is this something, for whatever reason,
we don't address on this list?
tedd
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://sperling.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/