Previous Message
Next Message

<col> in Mozilla

Sent by Ian Hickson on 2 December 2003 17:05


On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Lars Holst wrote:
>>
>> As I understand it, IE in Longhorn is not expected to have any HTML,
>> CSS, or DOM improvements over IE6.
>
> Huh? I am sure you have more insight into the "biz" Ian, but to me it
> sounds rather unreasonable to assume that there's not a single person in
> Redmond working on Explorer improvements, including CSS support.

According to the jobs listings that I looked at a few months ago, there is
no department within Microsoft that is currently assigned to working on
Trident (the Windows IE rendering engine), and all development on Tasman
(the Mac IE rendering engine) has been stopped (that last point was
publicly announced).

Microsoft have also publicly started that they could make no improvements
to IE that did not involve OS upgrades. Since they recently released a
preview of their post-Eolas-patent IE, which consisted of only changes to
the rendering engine, and did so without releasing a whole new OS, it can
be inferred that they are either lying, or are not going to be changing
the rendering engine.

Given their recent huge emphasis on Avalon, which is a technology that
reimplements HTML, CSS, DOM, XML Namespaces, SVG, SMIL, ECMAScript, XUL,
and XBL using their own proprietary markup languages, I don't see how it
would benefit them to also have a team working on improvements to IE's
rendering engine.

Note that in their recent Longhorn preview, the Web browser was a variant
of IE with only three changes: pop-up blocking, a download manager, and an
extensions manager. The rendering engine itself was, as far as I am aware,
unchanged from IE6. (Except it now support Avalon/XAML/.NET as well.)

Microsoft have also been observed dramatically reducing their W3C
commitments. Where they are still active, I am not aware of any claims
that they will implement new W3C standards (or even old ones being
updated, such as CSS2.1). This is in contrast to their previous behaviour,
which consisted of loud claims (within the W3C at least) of upcoming
products with strong support for the standard-du-jour.

Finally, of the people I know within Microsoft, none have told me of any
work on Trident. The only recent Web browser related work I have heard of
within Microsoft is related to their MSN TV product, which, if what I have
been told is correct, is not itself a very high priority anyway.

Now, it is of course possible that Microsoft are simply being very tight-
lipped about this. But I find this unlikely, given how widely they
circulated the rumours that they were working on fixing IE's standards
support in WinIE6 three years ago.

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
U+1047E                                         /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Previous Message
Next Message

Message thread:

Possibly related: