Sent by Eric A. Meyer on 20 November 2003 22:10
Hello,
The font size debate in this thread is now over, and the recent
messages that have come through illustrate precisely why I discourage
them. I should have stopped the thread sooner, and for that I
apologize. In the future, anyone who wants to castigate people for
their font-sizing choices may feel free to do it off-list. Anyone
who feels this to be an unacceptable restriction may feel free to
leave the list.
I've cc:ed everyone who has participated in the font-size portion
of this thread so that they can all see this before the message shows
up on the list, which I expect to happen in a few hours. (Thank you
SO much, spammers.) I hope that will help put a quick stop to the
now-finished argument. If not, I will consider stronger measures.
As for the originally requested site check, I hope Don's been able
to get some assistance from people outside the whole font-sizing
thing. If not, then I hope he does. The thread isn't dead-- just
the font-size argument. Please act accordingly. Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
"CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously."
-- Martina Kosloff (http://www.mako4css.com/)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
