Sent by The Moose on 9 September 2003 14:02
> The problem is that it does not work as expected. In all of the major
> screen readers, when you hide material from visual display, you also
> hide it from screen readers.
Allo,
Isn't [speak: normal;] designed to override [display: none;] for screen
readers? I just wonder...
> Please read the results. It will answer a few of the likely questions.
> i.e. No, current screen readers do not read aural style sheets.
No, that is not entirely true. Please see:
http://www.speakthis.com/highlights.cfm?highlight=aural&name=Aural%20Style%20Sheet%20Support
This thing *converts* pages...
Whether it is used, and how widely, is *another matter*, but in any event
a minimal core subset of aural css is supported by something else than
Emacspeak. Your comments are of course valid for all popular screen
readers...
There is a BRUTAL, albeit nondestructive solution to this problem, I
think: force the BLOCK display for a given navigation list item and set
width (and height?) to ZERO with an addition of !important. This hides the
skiplink thingamajig for all sighted users, and preserves readability for
all others.
I think...
Wojtek
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/