Previous Message
Next Message

Re: [css-d] Help... please check this site.

Sent by Bob Jones on 31 January 2003 16:04


Andrew Clover wrote:
> Bob Jones [EMAIL-REMOVED]> wrote:
>
> The last element in content-long to have 'clear' is the <h1>Singles</h1>,
> so everything under that floats out of the container. To fix, add a
> <div> with 'clear: left' at the bottom of the content, just before the
> end of the content-long container.

Thanks... that fixed the overflow problem in Mozilla.

> (BTW, you probably don't want multiple <h1>s on the page; from a
> semantic-obsessive POV <h1> is a page title.)

I changed these to <h2>'s.  Better now?

> Suggest making .albumtitle 'clear: left' but not 'float: left', that
> seems to fix it. I think you're really using a bit too much float
> here; you really only need to left-float the the cover and tracks;
> the rest could be in normal flow.

I'm at work (Linux Desktop) and don't have access to IE, so I don't 
know if doing the above fixed what you were talking about there... did 
it?  However in Mozilla when I remove the 'float: left;' from 
albumplayers it causes the list to jump up to right under the 
albuminfo content (see 
http://www.crookedfingers.com/new/discography/index2.html ).  This is 
the behavior I was experiencing in IE 6.  However, the way I want it 
to look is found at  http://www.crookedfingers.com/new/discography/ 
with the list of players lining up on the same row as the track 
listing.  If there is a way to get this to work without floating the 
players I'm all ears (or a way to get it to work in IE period).

> By the way, you are using the absolute font keywords ('large', 'small')
> - this is bad news for IE, which makes each of those one size too big
> (even in IE6, as your <?xml?> declaration causes it to use Quirks mode).
> Suggest using % instead to avoid the problem.

So, what's the general suggestion for % font sizes?  Small at 80%, 
large at 120%, x-larget at 140%?  What's the group's suggestion?

>   <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="lyricpopup('smcd')">
> 
> You don't want to do that. Actually you don't really ever want to use
> javascript: pseudo-URLs. See:
> 
>   http://www.evolt.org/article/js/17/20938/

Thanks for the pointer.  That was some old code I put in place a 
couple of years ago and had not revisited.  Fixed it now (though I had 
to switch doctype to xhtml 1.0 transitional to get it to validate).

Thanks,
Bob
Previous Message
Next Message

Message thread: