Sent by Stephanie Sullivan on 13 October 2002 05:05
on 10/12/02 8:28 PM, John A. Lewis at [EMAIL-REMOVED] wrote:
> I set the width (or min-width and max-width) in ems. That way, the
> width of the box is always relative to the size of the text. Thus, it
> should be much easier to keep the two sensible even with huge text
> sizes.
>
> Instead of getting a tiny box when enlarging text, you get a box that
> is more or less equally bigger.
That's a totally novel idea... But sounds like a great one... I already use
ems and % for my text... So how would I translate that into my box sizes??
Stephanie Sullivan
VioletSky Design
http://www.violetsky.net
³Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.² --
Thomas Alva Edison
