Sent by Geoff Sheridan on 2 September 2002 18:06
I think you're right. I also think it can be further simplified to:
div.content {
[... other properties ...]
width: 400px; /* for IE5/Win */
w\idth: 300px; /* for good browsers */
}
...Because I don't think there *are* any browsers which don't support
escapes and yet have worthwhile support for the box model. Prove me
wrong!
Geoff
At 1:01 pm -0400 2/9/02, Kentaro Kaji wrote:
>I must be missing something, but wouldn't the SBMH also work like this?
>
>div.content {
> [... other properties ...]
>
> width: 300px; /* for browsers with no escapes at all */
> \width: 400px; /* for IE5/Win */
> w\idth: 300px; /* for good browsers */
>}
>
>...?
>
>happily yours, ken
>
> > From: http://and.doxdesk.com/personal/posts/css/20020212-bmh.html
>>
>> div.content { width: 300px; } /* for browsers with no escapes at all */
>> div.content { \width: 400px; } /* for IE5/Win */
> > div.content { w\idth: 300px; } /* for good browsers */