> Bill Braun said:
>> Setting aside the moral implications, having made a transition from a
>> site built completely around tables to one based on <div>, the latter,
>> in my experience and opinion, takes much better advantage of CSS. I have
>> been able to do everything using <div> as I did using <table>, in a much
>> more flexible manner, and, again in my opinion, with a slight edge in
>> favor of design aesthetics.
> Based on "divs"? Hello? What about "based on structural semantic markup
> and CSS-layout techniques"?
> You guys - Bill, Claude - sound like you have contracted divitis* in
> your migration to CSS-layout techniques. Better find a cure.
Your interpretation is a bit on the literal side, but I am grateful for
your kind words nevertheless.
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/