Sent by MB on 7 March 2010 20:08
[EMAIL-REMOVED] said:
>I'm currently using one based on a template from http://www.joomlart.com
>called ja_rochea. I moved around, eliminated, and added divs, and redid
>most of the css, so it's not much like the original. But at least it
>wasn't based on tables, if that's what you mean.
Well, I prefer to not use tables for layout nor "Divitis-suffering"
layouts. I'd like templates with lists, when the content is likely to be
lists, like for instance lists of articles, navigation and similar, and
tables only when the content is likely to be tabular. And so on. HTML
may be incomplete, but so be it.
On the other hand, a well made DIV-markup based layout may be very easy
to change yourself to your type of markup, if it's not a "tag soup".
It turns out, however, I'm going to write my own publishing engine
instead for this assignment, so no Joomla this time.
Thanks for your response.
/MB
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/