Previous Message
Next Message

are there changes in the css validator?

Sent by Chris Williams on 4 December 2009 21:09


No, I'm wrong.  It's suggested, and I've always used it, but as someone else
noted off line to me, it's not required.  Either by the std. or by the
validator.  Sorry for the error.

Chris


> From: David Hucklesby [EMAIL-REMOVED]>
> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:23:24 -0800
> To: Chris Williams [EMAIL-REMOVED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL-REMOVED]>
> Subject: Re: [css-d] are there changes in the css validator?
> 
> Chris Williams wrote:
>> The URL parameter needs the value quoted.  E.G. should be
>> url('value').
>> 
> 
> Are you sure, Chris?
> 
> It looks to me as if the validator complains about a single value for
> the background-position property. From my reading of the specs, though,
> I think that a single value is valid. (???)
> 
> I am as confused as the OP...
> 
> Cordially,
> David

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Previous Message
Next Message

Message thread:

Possibly related: