Sent by William Reilly on 7 November 2003 19:07
I'd be curious:
== Has anyone ever heard from any Microsoft employee / defender / apologist on
any public listserv (or other venue) speak up about the how and why their
rendition of HTML-izing has to be quite so bad as it is???
I mean, we know why, I suppose: round-tripping to MS-Word being the central
raison d'etre for working with HTML, according to Redmond, but still...
== Are the new "File | Save As..." options in Office 11/2003 making any of
this appreciably better?
William Reilly
Somerville, Massachusetts U.S.A.
=============================
On Friday 07 November 2003 peeter talvistu, wrote:
> It is hard to make it work 100% well, though, because Word's html is
> so - and let me be blunt - idiotic (thousands of <b> and <strong> tags for
> marking one paragraph bold for example).
--
http://cms-list.org/
please trim your posts.